Intelligentsia said:
You've done quite a job making a fool of yourself in this post. Shall I correct you? Okay I will. You say: isn't it a known fact that Zimmerman wanted to confront Trayvon? Short answer: Absolutely not. Long answer: Following someone is not confronting them. These are separate ideas. Do you realize that? Let me consult your post...one second. "Also, isn't it pretty much a known fact that Zimmerman wanted to confront Trayvon? Has it not been confirmed that Zimmerman was following him? This is known to the world at this point, man. He wouldn't have been following him if he didn't want to confront him. He pretty much called for back up and GOT OUT OF THE CAR to continue following him LOL Now you're just struggling to make sense =D" Quite the display of incompatible ideas and revelatory asininity. You say confirmation of following means confrontation. You seem not to realize that these are entirely different concepts entirely. And then laugh at your own faulty logic as if to say "I AM STUPID." Bravo. Well done. You proceed to say "He wouldn't have been following him if he didn't want to confront him." More confirmation of utter stupidity. He even explains why he was following in multiple interviews. You know, the ones with police - not TV personalities. Furthermore, he explains that after he was told that he did not need to follow that he stopped doing it. Busted logic again. I've lost count at this point how many fallacies I've demolished here already. WOW! You said something along the lines of "continue to try and provide evidence that Zimmerman didn't grab Trayvon." This is the same as challenging me to debunk your claim. If you can't understand this, there is really no hope for you at all: you're braindead. He does say skipped (seemed to be an inappropriate for what he wanted to say) - notice I said I followed the trial. As in, watched the proceedings not TV interviews. Haha, what a source. You're welcome to believe that Santa Claus and his 8 reindeer swooped down and punched zimmerman in the face as well. There is just as much evidence (or lack thereof) for that. Peasants...
|
Looks like i've made someone angry lol
Nah
Him following and pretty much calling for the police to get there shows that he eventually wanted to confront him atleast in some way, shape or form.
Hmm you seem to not like that link i posted. Is something wrong with it? Zimmerman and Sean Hannity were talking about what happened that night, correct? So what's the problem? He is a "TV Personality" so what. They were still talking about what happened that night at the end of the day
I also said "feel free" to continue because i already knew that you would go out your way to do so. You're the one doing the most. Creating new accounts and what not
and your bringing up the TV interview saying "wow what a source" as if it's not credible enough all of a sudden even though it IS George Zimmerman talking about what happened that night LMAO XD
Lol and there he goes with the name calling.. AGAIN
You should stop messing around in situations you cant handle Instead of throwing hissy fits
;)