By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
disolitude on 08 July 2013
Edit Thread
AnthonyW86 said:
disolitude said:

Yeah but the settings for this benchmark aren't the same as the one OP posted.

For the OP, crysis 3 is getting 8 FPS on a GTX 680. The benchmark you posted is getting 20-25 fps, which means AA and settings must have been lowered to a point where VRAM isn't a bottleneck anymore. 

The description said FXAA enabled, though maybe at lower levels than that in the OP. But seriously at 4K resolution who gives a damn, will you even notice it? It's definitely not worth dropping a thrith of the framerate.

Looking at the SLI/crossfire performance you will see that high end gaming is definitely possible at 4k, as long as you don't crank filtering and AA settings up to pointless levels:

Yep, totally possible I have no doubts. I mean there are people that game on 3X 2560x1600 monitors now. Thats way more pixels that 4K...

I have had no issues running 3X1080p with 2 670s and 2 7950s and high settings as long as FXAA is utilized and some details are left out like ambient oclusion or DOF...