By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
slowmo said:
The Fury said:

No bloody kidding. You'd think that's what journalist did or something.

Why do they need to write a retraction? Did they make up horrible hurtful things about Don Mattick's family so they have to apologise? They are going to be pointing out their decision by analytical journalism, which isn't really something that can be retracted as they've got nothing to retract. It's opinion based on known facts.

 

Why do you feel you need to defend them so much, do you have shares in Edge or Sony?

No shares. Future PLC would be stupid to invest in, magazine market as a whole is shrinking. Sony are climbing so might be worth it but alas, I've no idea how to buy them.

This said, I'm defending the journalists that many here think are so without integrity they'd take money from Sony to publish this article. It's like people assume just because they are a magazine they aren't allowed to have an opinion, even if it's backed up with facts that affect them. 



Hmm, pie.