Currently Online 
| slowmo said:
I think the entire point is they're professional journalists writing a headline to get attention, if they get it wrong then yes they should be ridiculed. Journalists should ALWAYS be held accountable for what they write. Of course it could be they write a retraction article later down the line if things went different in which case I would review my attitude and reaction towards them. |
No bloody kidding. You'd think that's what journalist did or something.
Why do they need to write a retraction? Did they make up horrible hurtful things about Don Mattick's family so they have to apologise? They are going to be pointing out their decision by analytical journalism, which isn't really something that can be retracted as they've got nothing to retract. It's opinion based on known facts.
Hmm, pie.
