S.T.A.G.E. said:
enditall727 said:
Figgycal said:
Maybe I would have more sympathy for Zimmerman if, you know, he didn't kill a 17 year old kid. What part of that is defensible? Forget he's black (for you racists out there- you know who you are) ; forget that he called Zimmerman a cracker- who gives a shit (is anyone here offended by that?). This kid's life was cut tragically short by a paranoid stalker with a history of being prejudiced.
And you got to love the contradictions between the Sean Hannity interview, which made him look horribly guilty- and his testimony. Two things I remember specifically about that interview were: "I reached into my pocket"- right before he claims Trayvon attacked him- and as it turned out he had a gun on him and Trayvon had every right to be afraid. And saying him killing Trayvon was part of God's plan- keeping it classy.
EDIT:Sean Hannity interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaua8aAUpOs
I don't remember where what was said, but there are some contrasts between the stories starting at 7:00 and 11:00
|
I just watched about 20 mins of that interview and i must say that he conducted his self pretty well and it seemed believeable but their are a lot of people saying that he is supposedly inconsistent and that more vids of his need to be watched to catch his contradictions. I dont even feel like doing that right now though Lol
|
He's consistent. No one stays 100% the same everytime they speak. Consistency is based off of trueness to the original story. No person tells one story the same way and even worse when pespectives are added from other people.
|
Oh i didn't see this post
I guess you're right about the consistency thing though
