George Zimmerman Trial

[silentdj151]

Veracity said:

silentdj151 said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

silentdj151 said:

Veracity said:

Always a treat when someone completely clueless chimes in who has not watched a single minute of the proceedings pawns off their vociferous nonsense as a substantiated case. 

Go watch the trial you ignorant person.

its very clear that TM attacked Zimmerman. 

yes an assualt occurred, which Zimmerman started because he got out of his car and preceded to confront someone who was hiding in a bush.

We don't know if Zimmerman started it. There were no eyewitnesses. Both sides are incompetent. The only thing that can be done about this case is to find out whether it was murder or self defense and even then the case is still broken.

Ok let me put this as simple as I can: Zimmerman started the events that caused someone to die.

Only thing martin was doing that night was walking home from buying candy and tea

 

 

Should be a criminal act to present bad logic. That's like saying if I walk up to a stranger to ask them the time and they kill me it's my fault because I walked up to him.if Zimmerman was going to fight I would agree. He wasn't.

I am referring to this situation only...not your shitty counter argument