By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
LurkerJ said:
kowenicki said:
 

This is true.

but also I'd suggest PS+ is a better service for more casual gamers.  Surely more active gamers have played most of decent PS+ content before it hits PS+

In other words, it's a better service for most gamers

Perhaps it is.  When I say casual, I mean very casual (time devotion wise)

Will they pay for it?


I buy 5-8 games per year (got 3 already every day), i check youtube on a daily basis and watch previews/trailers/interviews of games, i check game websites daily to read on news, and i game almost on a daily basis(mostly on my pc). I have over 30 ps3 games in my collection, 10+ games on my pc.  Their are many great games that i don't buy because i would rather use the money on a game or genra which i prefer. 

I'm not a casual gamer, i consider myself a hardcore gamer even though i stay most of the time playing the mp of 1-3 games. But at the same time i'm a sucker for rpgs and open world games, and i put 250+hours into skyrim without mods. I find ps+ to be of great value for me because it will allow me to pay games that i woudn't have the chance to, at the same time broadening the type of games that i play.