DigitalFoundry: X1 memory performance improved for production console/ESRAM@192 GB/s

[ethomaz]

Nsanity said:

ethomaz said:
No difference after all.

The eSRAM can run at 1TB/s that will not change the fact the biggest pool of RAM runs at 68GB/s... you can't use the eSRAM for all just for cache some little data (32MB).

And... why people sum the bandwidths?

Is this your opinion or some else's from NeoGaf?

What do you mean?

Edit - I undertood now... no it's always my opinion... I didn't even read the gaf before write that... why?

And I read wrong and fixed... they are not suming the bandwidth.