ethomaz on 28 June 2013
No difference after all.
The eSRAM can run at 1TB/s that will not change the fact the biggest pool of RAM runs at 68GB/s... you can't use the eSRAM for all just for cache some little data (32MB).
8GB@176GB/s vs 32MB@192GB/s
"Now that close-to-final silicon is available, Microsoft has revised its own figures upwards significantly, telling developers that 192GB/s is now theoretically possible. Theoretical peak performance is one thing, but in real-life scenarios it's believed that 133GB/s throughput has been achieved with alpha transparency blending operations (FP16 x4)."
