DigitalFoundry: X1 memory performance improved for production console/ESRAM@192 GB/s

[theprof00]

disolitude said:

theprof00 said:
wow looks like disolitude is wrong again :D
Guess they did go for higher bandwidth in the end, despite dis saying they didn't need it.

Actually no, it proves me right. It shows that X1 didn't need touse GDDR5 RAM. Perfectly capable with DDR3 + esRAM

I thought your point of that thread was that their setup was perfectly in sync with their output, and they didn't need the high speed of gddr5. If I'm wrong about that, my bad. That's how I interpreted it, although I do see that a large part of it was about gddr5, I thought it was more about the speed