How not to defend atheism

[Jay520]

Player1x3 said:

Jay520 said:

Player1x3 said:

Jay520 said:
Atheism doesn't need to be defended.

Atheism is only the default based on which definition of it you subscribe to.

The definition I use based on my social experiences with the phenomenon is a belief that there is/are no god(s) rather than a lack of belief in god(s).

The subtle distinction, for my point of view, plays a major role in shaping attitudes and active discussions about the topic, to the extent that atheism doesn't really qualify as a null claim but rather an alternate positive claim.

Of course you know which definition is the right definition, I presume?

There is no right defenition, its all subjective

Well, one definition is more official than the others. Are you telling me we can just change definitions as we please?