Kasz216 said:
Soleron said:
Kasz216 said:
Green Energy policies should really only be about preserving local greenery.
Attempting to stop climate change is the height of folly. You wouldn't be able to do anything comprehensive and useful without threat of war.
Carbon exporting/ demand for fossil fuels being FAR greater then supply means that all you do by giving up cheap energy is allow that cheap energy to be used by others.
It's like trying to save yourself a slice of pizza at a college frat party. It's now or never for that Pizza.
|
Pretty much this. I'd be much happier with a $50 billion commitment to fusion research, and a stopgap plan to expand nuclear fission capacity.
|
Or really ANY renewables. Renewable enrgy research or even any alternate energy research is awesome. Trying to stop using fossil fuels though only hurts us, with no actual enviromental benefit.
Instead of spending more for gas, we should use those savings on scientific research.
That's how China got so good at renewables. (well that and hacking American solar companies.)
|
That works both ways my friend
OP: Anyways hope that pipeline would decrease the price of gas, but its probably wont do much.
