superchunk said:
How are the three builds I posted not more powerful? CPU PS4 has a low-power AMD Jaguar CPU. 8-cores @ 1.6GHz with NO L3 cache and 2MB L2 cache PER 4-cores (4MB total). The AMD I listed above is a normal-power AMD Vishera CPU. 8-cores @ 3.5GHz with 8MB of L3 cache and 2MB L2 cache PER 2-cores (8MB total). I don't see how you can argue the lower end Jaguar at less than 1/2 the clock and FAR less cache is going to outperform the Vishera CPU. The two intel i5s are only quad-core, but they routinely outperform AMDs 8-core, especially in gaming. http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/698?vs=702 (comparison of the Vishera CPU I listed and the higher end i5) I think I've shown definitively my CPU choices are better than PS4s. GPU (all 256-bit) PS4 has an AMD GPGPU @800MHz - 1152 cores - 1.84TF. The Sapphire HD7850 I picked is @920MHz - 1024 cores - 1.88TF. I'd say these are very comparable cards and better than both consoles. RAM PS4 has 8GB of GDDR5 at 176GB/s that is on the MOBO. My configurations have: (corrected g.skill RAM link) While my ram is slower than both in the main 8GB of ram, it includes 2GB on GPU itself that matches the highest rate. I think in the long run my 10GB total ram beats/matches Xbone and is comparable to PS4 to not really matter. Conclusion I was right all along. (Though I was definitely not far exceeding PS4... probably more on par with it than exceeding) |
I'm pretty sure you can drop 8 core AMD and go with quad, Athlon X4 740 or FX 41xx for example.
As for GPU, I don't think 7850 will cut it, PS4's GPU is from the start better than that (plus usual Windows overhead), and, as devs start using it's compute enchancements more and more, it will start moving closer to 7870.
I'd rather go with quad and 7870 for about the same price.







