| ethomaz said: This config will never run games better than PS4 and you forget OS, Mouse, keyboard, etc. The others config you posted too... not "powerful" enough to reach PS4. |
|
blublibla said: Yeah then you should have gotten your fact straight, the PC you just build is nowhere near as powerful as the PS4 |
How are the three builds I posted not more powerful?
CPU
PS4 has a low-power AMD Jaguar CPU.
8-cores @ 1.6GHz with NO L3 cache and 2MB L2 cache PER 4-cores (4MB total).
The AMD I listed above is a normal-power AMD Vishera CPU.
8-cores @ 3.5GHz with 8MB of L3 cache and 2MB L2 cache PER 2-cores (8MB total).
I don't see how you can argue the lower end Jaguar at less than 1/2 the clock and FAR less cache is going to outperform the Vishera CPU.
The two intel i5s are only quad-core, but they routinely outperform AMDs 8-core, especially in gaming.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/698?vs=702 (comparison of the Vishera CPU I listed and the higher end i5)
I think I've shown definitively my CPU choices are better than PS4s.
GPU (all 256-bit)
PS4 has an AMD GPGPU @800MHz - 1152 cores - 1.84TF.
Xbone has an AMD GPGPU @800MHz - 768 cores - 1.23TF.
The Sapphire HD7850 I picked is @920MHz - 1024 cores - 1.88TF.
I'd say these are very comparable cards and better than both consoles.
RAM
PS4 has 8GB of GDDR5 at 176GB/s that is on the MOBO.
Xbone has 8GB of DDR3 at 68.3GB/s that is on the MOBO. (+32MB eSRAM @ 102GB/s on GPU)
My configurations have: (corrected g.skill RAM link)
8GB of DDR3 at 21.3GB/s (on MOBO)
PLUS
2GB of GDDR5 at 176GB/s (on GPU)
While my ram is slower than both in the main 8GB of ram, it includes 2GB on GPU itself that matches the highest rate. I think in the long run my 10GB total ram beats/matches Xbone and is comparable to PS4 to not really matter.
Conclusion
I was right all along. (Though I was definitely not far exceeding PS4... probably more on par with it than exceeding)
