Hynad said:
Darth Tigris said:
Lafiel said:
Darth Tigris said:
Greatly devalues the PS Eye for the entire Gen. If the main penalty for including it is only price parity with one of your competitors, not sure if that is worth it. Feels more like a lack of confidence in it's worth. |
Is that so?
I think a good portion of multiplatform titles will have Kinect features, most of which should be available to PS4 Eye owners aswell. And most first party titles will make sure to include some Eye functionality anyway, so in my opinion there could be quite a lot of PS4Eye support due to the Kinect.
|
That's certainly possible. I'd imagine that the same ones complaining about Kinect being forced on us will gladly go purchase a PS Eye at that point and preach about it's value, completely missing the hypocritical irony (see PS+ mp requirement response) ...
|
That's a lot of maybes and assumptions to make your complaint fit your agenda.
|
Oh I have no agenda (other than exposing hypocrisy). What I stated in my original comment is a fact: not having the PS Eye with every PS4 sold gives developers no clear incentive to invest time and money into using it's features. It's what has been truthfully stated about every add-on in the history of consoles.
After that I got a response full of "maybes and assumptions" as you called them and responded with some myself.
Truthfully, this story is full of maybes and assumptions to begin with. Be careful throwing that "agenda" accusation around.
Essay Pro