| bananaking21 said: i am one of those guys. honestly im still on the fence about PS+, on one hand i feel that i shouldnt be forced to pay to play online. but on the other i feel PS+ is VERY valueble. i without a doubt believe that everything you get from PS+ is soooo much more worth the 50 bucks a year. i also stated that if MS added dedicated servers for EVERY game then xbox live starts to get worth the money. ultimatly on the 360, you didnt get anything other than the ability to pay online on the 360 for getting a gold subscribtion, thats not the case on PS+, they arent holding back access to netflix, hulu and that stuff, they arent holding back cross game chat to make it seem like they are giving you value for the subscribtion like xbox live. they are giving you value for your money. im not defending sony, i still beleve that without dedicated servers you should pay to play online, but if you did, it wont feel like a scam, thats my point. |
I know companies do it to make money off their console , but I really don't like the fact that I'm already paying for internet access- I don't need another fee on top of that to use it on a console I spent a couple hundred bucks on and a game I invested 60 bucks into. I'm sure sony looked at Microsoft's plan and saw how much money they were missing out on. I do like PS plus though and the fact that they aren't making you pay for free to play games.
Unrelated: Also, I know that supposedly every multiplayer game is gonna have dedicated servers on xbox one (a feature I want to see on ps4 at least for big games), but come on- you're telling me that Activision can't get their own dedicated servers for COD? I'm not asking for much, but the biggest triple A titles can afford their own dedicated servers-I shouldn't have to help them pay for it.
