Slimebeast said:
Invasion of privacy to combat crime. I support that. To me violent crime is far worse than my loss of privacy in front of a bunch of anonymous CIA or NSA agents. And by its very nature surveillance has to be as secret as possible. If it was totally open and public then it wouldn't be able to combat crime as effectively. This isn't anything new. All nations have always had secret agencies to fight the bad guys. |
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
-Benjamin Franklin
If there was some mystical barrier out there that prevented them from abusing this power, perhaps I would be less opposed. Unfortunately, that power does not exist. This ability has the potential to be misused and abused in so many ways that it'd be impossible to count. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Leave this ability to the whims of whoever comes into power, and it will eventually be abused (if it hasn't been already).









