ethomaz on 24 June 2013
|
walsufnir said: Where does your link say "fat32"? Of course they do some encryption but why fat32? UFS would make more sense. I never saw a unix-like system running "/" on fat32, ever. Because the file-system itself lacks *any* support for extended file-attributes and file-system access restrictions... |
I read in other forums... FAT32 is confirmed... and consoles don't need extended file-attributes or access restrictions.
FAT32 is fast.
PS. I'm readin more... not confirmed... I don't know, nobody knows... in fact it is custom based in FAT32, ext3 or other FS lol
