Once more I agree with Badger Gnome and Kasz.
But let me underline the issues once more:
- unless it's totally twisted, used goods market is always beneficial to the new goods one
- GameStop twisted the used market, but MS tried to solve this screwing everybody. What's worse is that if it managed to get away with it, it would probably have ended up making a deal with GS for the business of selling the "reactivation" of used games so rewarding who was just the first offender and screwing again the end-user.
- Some people are blinded because they think ditching MS proposal means losing some good features, but those good features can still be implemented as an incentive for those VOLUNTARILY choosing the new system and regularly checking online their games, without forcing those that prefer the old one (or that are forced to use it, always or sometimes).
