LordTheNightKnight on 25 February 2008
| xenophon13 said: ok lord obviously they are not your reasons, they are your stated reasons. here i go, i am going to list a few articles that i can find just so you dont think i am making this up: http://phoenix.bizjournals.com/extraedge/consultants/succeeding_today/2008/02/25/column505.html?market=phoenix http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7252506.stm http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9874808-7.html?tag=nefd.lede http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120343622985476997.html?mod=googlenews_wsj http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hfFVgshT7PqGp1otzd4w1kJ_MecQD8UTM37G0 http://www.smh.com.au/news/articles/bluray-the-victor-in-nextgen-dvd-war/2008/02/18/1203190700636.html Ok i could go on but i wont. You think it was minor, me and the rest of the world think that that the role the ps3 played was major. We can disagree, i am ok with that. |
Bullshit. Those articles may make a case for the PS3*, but they do NOT prove the "rest of the world" disagrees with me. Enough of that "I think so, therefore (without any surveys), most people think so," tripe.
*And honestly, we may not know the full facts. Plus I should make it clear that minor does not mean the same as slight in this context (unless the definition actually does, in which case, I'll look for a better term).
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
