|
walsufnir said: Well, at first "yes, we changed it! hahaa!" And then "Oh damn, this could perhaps lead to a situation where Sony is not dominating... Damage control! Don't trust'em guys, don't trust'em! It's still M$! Believe in the holy Sony!" |
I think funny a lot of people saying "Sony made MS changed", "MS changed die Sony fans", "the bad press made MS change", "the gamer forum community made MS changed", etc.
Bullshit.
The only thing that can make a company of the size of MS change is that they will profit less over a product in the future... that the point... MS just changed due a unique fact "they know people won't buy their console like it was before".
We need good inovations and not bad inovations.
Why not make the holy family sharing feature only for digital buyers and stay the offline disc based gaming for others... give the choice to the consumer... it is the best ideia.
I will try to give you a example...
Before AMD created the hybrid 32/64bits processor called x86_64 today... Intel tried several times to move to 64bits without success but the consumer didn't buy that... so AMD move for the future mantain the past and have the successs that Intel always wanted... I can say for sure if Intel or AMD create today a processor only 64bits nobody will complain about 
It's the same case.
MS needs to try to move the things slowly and not changed everhing at the same time... try to make the inovations for these that buys digital titles and mantin the retail discs like it was today.
That my opinion about the subject.
And MS is in a way better position today than yesterday for sure and they mistakes for now was because they only looked at the themselves and the publishers... try to understand the consumers and makes the best way for the transition.
