eques judicii on 04 June 2007
I think the difference is that sometimes a game that is fun and enjoyable doesn't necessarily warrant a high score. The fact is that most reviewers have said that the gameplay is fun but the game lacks content (only 9 levels and 3 game modes) and that there are things that seem lacking.
My impression is that the game is actually really good, but its just lacking a lot of content. The critics base the game on what it contains, how it plays, art style, and replayability. I think shadowrun plays great and is very replayable but lacks art style and content. Thus, gamers will like it but critics will not.
