CGI-Quality said:
If you haven't played it, you can't place a judgment on what should/shouldn't get a 10. According to the reviews, the game offers scenarios and such that other games haven't, but I think it should go a little deeper than that... I don't personally like giving any game 10/10 (to me, it implies perfection, and regardless of what's new/been done before, no game is perfect), but sequels, just like new IPs, can offer genre-defining changes. I understand why sites give 10/10, though. In most cases, it means a game gets close enough to perfection, by the sum of its parts, which is what the review should convey. This is also why I think the numeric reviewing system should be done away with. The words of the review, itself, are far more vital. |
If you want to rank things then A,B,C system is better than numeric, as it is theoretically infinite in both directions. If A is the highest letter and E is the lowest and you have plusses and minuses then you can always add one more minus to E out to infinity and you can always add another + to A out to infinity. So there's no such thing as the perfect game because no matter how many +'s you put on that A someone can always add another one (I give Uncharted 3 an A+++++++++. Oh yeah! well I give Gears of War 3 an A++++++++++, so suck on that!). Which means hopefully every sensible review site just sticks with A+ for an all around excellent game.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix