Kasz216 said:
Nvidia's videogame revenue was extremely disapointing last gen, they just didn't want to chase after the low ass margins the consoles provide, let alone at the even lower margins that AMD were offering because well.... AMD is desperate. They lost a billion dollar last year.
Really AMD's situation mirrors Sony, (Right up to selling their headquarters) except Sony has the advantages of being on the top in their field at one point and having good profitable buisnsesses. Well, and Sony actually moved their headquareters after they sold the building, they weren't desperate enough to sell their offices then just lease those exact same offices from the company who bought them. That's just... really bad. http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/04/the-rise-and-fall-of-amd-how-an-underdog-stuck-it-to-intel/ http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/04/amd-on-ropes-from-the-top-of-the-mountain-to-the-deepest-valleys/3/ (to skip to the console part) This is something people who are coming in from consoles might not know but... really this is a last chance gamble for AMD.
I think they're REALLY hoping somehow the Xbox One becomes huge as a TV Box. |
At the time they didn't have anything similar to amd's apu / hsa design far enough developed to match amd's offering only tegra , recently they said maxwell will be their first gpu to use system ram , so yes they didn't have anything to match and are playing catch up it happens , both sides have been ahead in certain areas over the years ,also I agree amd needed it more than Nvidia ,still if Nvidia had something to compete they could have cut their rival off at the knees denying them much neeeded income , about selling property and leasing it back it happens all the time .
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot