Wright said:
Hawkeyejonjon said:
Wright said:
1.- Assassin's Creed 2 needs Gold too?
2.- This is a new model for Live. So long, I'm not complaining. Not the best of the starts, but not bad either.
3.- But that's precisely what turns some people off. Keep on paying.
4.- That's cool for, let's say, The Cave or Vanquish. But try beating Demon's Souls or X-COM within days. You'll find yourself buying 3-months subscriptions or renewing another month if you want to finish it.
|
1 by all terms yes
2 it isn't the new model for live when it will only last till the Xbox One releases (yes the two free games will stop in November)
3 Than don't pay and play single player (it sucks but that is how it is and how much it costs to keep the network up and with them in a financial problem i can understand why they want to charge online. I had XBL and didn't mind so this will not affect me)
4 those two games are awesome but understand what you mean
I can understand some peoples problem with this but i don't think much people care.
|
1.- Assassin's Creed 2 doesn't have any online portion, except for DLC. So Gold is not required.
2.- Source?
3.- This entire point is what we're discussing, buddy.
4.- There are more examples!
|
1 No but it needs Gold to download it is what i meant
2 Kotaku, "Existing Xbox Live Gold members will begin receiving two free games per month until the launch of the Xbox One in November. The first two games will be Halo 3 and Assassin's Creed II. Fable III was already made free to Gold subscribers earlier today." Source: http://kotaku.com/existing-xbox-live-gold-members-will-begin-receiving-tw-512305727
4 Yeah and all i said they were great games and wrote understand what you mean so i don't need more examples
