By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wright on 16 June 2013
Edit Thread
VGKing said:
Wright said:
cmeese47 said:
You are paying for PS+ you get great games for free as well as access to multi player etc. If you think this is bad for gamers then you are wrong. Live really offer nothing but profits for 360 and still people paid for it year after year.


Live gives you free games that once you stop paying, you keep playing. If you stop playing for PS plus you don't keep playing your PS+ games.

 

Both models are bad for gaming, think about it before making absurds comparisons and derailing the thread.

1. You're wrong. For example one of the first games given out on live is Halo 3 right? YOU NEED XBL GOLD TO PLAY THAT GAME. So even if you could continue playing single-player, why would you? Multiplayer is what keeps people playing and it would be useless without it.

2. Also, PS Plus not only gives you more games per month, but they tend to not be 5 years old. PS Plus gives you free games that released during the last year.

3. Why would you stop paying for Plus when you are getting all these free games anyway? On PS4, you need Plus to play multiplayer so that's another reason to continue paying.

4. Games can be beaten within days. It doesn't matter if you lose access to it once your subscription runs out, you already beat the game lmfao. It's not like the game gets deleted off your HDD, it stays there and renewing your PS+ sub takes seconds. You even have the option of buying 3-month subscriptions.


1.- Assassin's Creed 2 needs Gold too?

2.- This is a new model for Live. So long, I'm not complaining. Not the best of the starts, but not bad either.

3.- But that's precisely what turns some people off. Keep on paying.

4.- That's cool for, let's say, The Cave or Vanquish. But try beating Demon's Souls or X-COM within days. You'll find yourself buying 3-months subscriptions or renewing another month if you want to finish it.