Lucas-Rio said:
F0X said:
Lucas-Rio said:
F0X said:
Lucas-Rio said:
F0X said:
Hold the phone. When did "production values" become so important? I, for one, don't make my cake-purchasing decisions based on the icing.
I enjoyed 3D Land just as much as the Galaxy games because the gameplay is excellent, and it was still absolutely not a slouch in terms of creative level design. If EAD Tokyo had tons more ideas that didn't make it into 3D Land, including multiplayer, and they believe that these things would work our far better on Wii U than 3DS, then more power to them. I trust them, because they're a reputable bakery knowing that a good cake comes from the ingredients first, not the toppings.
|
If you like 3D Land as much as Galaxy, then it's you who have a value problem.
But then, some people prefer McDonald's to real cooking.
|
You vastly underrate the quality of 3D Land's design. But I guess that doesn't matter as much as how much spit was used to polish a bunch of pixels.
|
I played it, I rate it correctly. It was a decent handheld effort.
But nowhere near the excellence of Galaxy's games. Biggest Nintendo disappointment ever, this Mario 3D world.
|
You're just going to have to accept the fact that not everyone sees things the same way you do, then. I think you're problem is that you got your hopes up for a new Wii U game in the vein of Galaxy, despite 3D Land being the more recent effort. And selling faster.
|
3D Land has been given for free with the console.
The Wii U version will end up selling less, like NSMBU did. Because it itsn't a killer app and nobody will buy the console for that joke of a game.
|
All the more reason to assume that it sells systems. As for NSMBU, it has the unfortunate problem of being the only major first-party game on the platform (sorry, Nintendo Land), and consumers usually prefer to buy consoles with more than one major title. I know I do.
