happydolphin said:
| theprof00 said:
You also wrote "assigns a monetary value to virtual assets which should concern you if the drm stuff at MS conference was an issue".
:/
You know what happy, just say exactly what you are trying to say. How is assigning monetary value to these items like xb1 DRM.
If the goal by PS is to be like "this is a tough trophy, we know. You can just buy it if you want, or trade it from someone through auction", then I'm still not seeing how this is like xb1 DRM. Your point continues to elude me. Giving an option to buy a trophy is a "who the fuck cares" issue. Not owning your own property is fucking not even remotely close to that. Just leave the gloves on the floor happy.
Just explain how it's the same, and leave out broad statements like "it's monetizing", say, "it's monetizing, and here's how, and here's why it's bad, and how it's the same"
|
My gloves have been off for the past two posts. I'm saying that Sony monetizing virtual assets (by assigning money to virtual assets) is a very slippery slope. You assign a money value to a trophey and suddenly you're turning things that have essentially little material value a cost. If MS' stance on making people pay for online and all other money-ensuring mechanisms they put into play alert some people, I'm not suer why this wouldn't. If I didn't answer your question here, call me lol.
|
How is bolded like italicized. Do not answer with underlined.
Saying 'I'm not sure how it's not the same', is essentially saying 'I'm not sure how it's the same', which is essentially saying you don't know how to say it's niether the same nor different.
