theprof00 said:
Your points were about the DRM. The DRM problem refers specifically to the ability to sell used games. THAT'S the big issue that people are complaining about if you haven't been paying attention to the news. So yes, very dfferent assertion. "Is it not you that is arguing in favour of formalised and clearly tangible systems and services?" That's not what I'm arguing for. I'm arguing that we should only admit evidence that has been clearly provided. |
We're drawing very different conclusions from the same information.
You are, in my opinion, dramatically overstating the impact that Microsoft's DRM will have on gamers, as well as overstating its difference from Sony's system. You're not overstating the reaction of the gaming media, which has been incredibly reactionary and ill-informed.
Gaikai exists. Sony will attempt to implement some of its technologies in PS4. That is all that is guarenteed. What is far from guarenteed is how they will do this, when they will do this, and whether any of this will in anyway match up to the extensive and specific cloud technologies Microsoft has already announced and is already utilising in its game development.
One thing 4k output will have in common with DRM though, is t he remarkably small number of people it has a tangible effect on.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS