Bodhesatva said:
Then answer the other questions, please. Do you agree that, as you put it, the "huge library of games that covered every genre" was a critical component of the PS2's overwhelming success, and that a large portion of the people chose that particular console because of this component? |
Had you been paying attention, you'd see that they've already been answered. Yes, the games were a critical component, but that's really just stating the obvious, and the games were certainly no more critical a component than were the others. Had the PS2 released at a price of say, $500, then that would take away the affordability, which would have led to lower hardware sales regardless of what games were on it. It would have also rendered the PS2's DVD playback irrelevant as a DVD player could be had for $300. When a console sells as well as the PS2, it's never just one thing. It's because of a multitude of reasons.
Consoles owned: Saturn, Dreamcast, PS1, PS2, PSP, DS, PS3
