The Fury said:
I wish that was the case. The majority of people who are saying it is okay, they are the ones that seems already happy to part with their money for PS+ so it make little difference on the grand scale of things. For me, a PS3 owner who likes to play online and has done for free and doesn't pay for PS+, it pisses me off. X-box Live is a service that has certain benefits over PSN because it was paid for, I'd expect as much. Now Sony have to keep up, so to speak, their games rental is a great feature which many liked but with Live new 'here are some free games', Sony have to make up for it by giving more, and taking away one feature isn't giving more. I won't be buying a PS4 at launch or anywhere near as long as many of the games I want are coming out on PS3. Only way they could help is by including a year PS+ in the £350 cost, or change it to a flat £5 for the entir year to play as many games online as you want but if you want to get the free games and discounts, storage etc, you pay more. |
As a multi console owner I would have to pay 2 subscriptions now, which sucks. Totally agree if you a system new they should throw in a year subscription, it'll be nice. I'm sure some have problems with it, looking at N4G (god knows why I still use that site) 99% of the people there just don't seem to care although they were poking fun at MS doing it earlier that day...
