By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem said:
disolitude said:
 

I supposed you see it more like this? Awesomeness is anabsolute value in your mind? 

There can be a limited amount of awesome and Xbox has decided to dedicate 50% of that awesome to TV and extra features while sony is giving most of its awesome to gaming?

 

 

Bottom line is that XB1 could even be a better gaming system than PS4 and have the extra features. No one really knows. But the general assumption around here is that PS4 = gaming, while Xbox = just TV.


That is correct, in accordance to the graphic. Thats what i was trying to get at.

There are still details we dont know about, but just taking into account the stealth fees, something like that is already the case.


The problem with the graph is that it's misleading. It's a graph essentially measuring % of features, not NUMBER of features. If Xbox has 40 gaming features and 40 media consumption features, many people would consider that superior to a 43/10 split... but it could yield a graph like that.

There is NOTHING to suggest the PS4 will have more gaming features, just more horsepower. Look at the current Gen, Xbox/Live has consistently, and right up to this day, had more "features" than PS3/PSN. The fact that MS has the resources to also develop massive amounts of additional content is not somehow a drawback.