For those with your head in the sand (PS4 DRM)

[Kasz216]

Max King of the Wild said:

Kasz216 said:

Max King of the Wild said:

Kasz216 said:

 

I suggest you take a logic course then. If the argument is ambigous or a premise isn't explicitly specified then you must give it the benefit of the doubt and assume the best case scenarios of the argument is what is being said.

Then i'd suggest you retake a logic course then.... since you must not of understood what you took.  Or just never learned about trust.  Instead only hard science logic.  When this would be social science we're talking here.

I note you've completely ignored answering my questions that had examples... because you know i'm right.

Honors Logic 100% A+... pretty sure I understood it perfectly and if my logic book wasn't in Milwaukee I would turn to the page that talks about being generous to peoples arguments

People's areguements who are known directly to mislead on a fairly consistant basis?

So again.  You believe Obama on everything he says in regards to the NSA and all the other recent scandals?

That's what your claim on logic suggests you do, or your being illogical right?

For a slightly exagerrated example... if someone tries to sell me a house, and i buy it and found out it was owned by someone else.  I should totally believe them the next time they try and sell me a house.

 

The problem here, as shown by the textbook you mentioned and class you mentioned is that your trying to apply formal logic(mathmatical logic) to non mathmatical statements made untrustworthy databrokers.