drkohler said:
I wasn't answering to your posts, I was just explaining that both solutions can be equivalent in performance, there is no "how stupid of MS to use ddr3" argument. (And as a sidenote, cache ram is quickly moving away from sram to edram) |
you did quote me... and if some one use that argument, you should quote them... i certainly didn't.
@bold, so you are saying that MS did wrong? SRAM is much better and a true cache RAM with lots of advantages over DRAM, only disadvantages is size, power consumption and cost... MS did good here (performance wise). and if that is happening (moving from SRAM -> DRAM) it has to be because of price and companies wanting to be "green". if they are indeed having problems with the eSRAM chip, the move to a eDRAM chip would cause a performance hit in the overall system but produce less heat... choices... choices...
|
|
Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4








