Slimebeast said:
All right, the whole chip. But it's the same problem - how can something be "of course more expensive" and at the same time weaker than the competition? What's the benefit of this design decision? That the machine will be able to communicate faster with separate OPs (which makes it fast to switch between different programs, like gaming, Kinect, Skype, TV etc)? That's the only argument I've heard so far. |
hi... sorry to get into the middle of this argument... but the reason MS has a bigger and more expensive chip is to allow them to use much less expensive RAM... its like this... MS= 40$ chip + 50$ mem while sony = 30$ chip + 80$ mem (these numbers are made up just to show a POV)
|
|
Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4








