By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mad55 said:
radiantshadow92 said:
Mad55 said:
radiantshadow92 said:
RolStoppable said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

WTF are you talking about? Sony has no DRM. If theres DRM third parties will inflict it themselves via client and Sony isnt alone in this Nintendo will get it too. MS created a system that virtually screws their consumers out of their ownership and ties them down to a true license. Third parties didnt have to screw you and have their sales affected because MS became their superman today. Sony has no DRM, you can play the PS4 offline. Sony has already said it.

Oh S.T.A.G.E. ...

Nintendo won't have DRM, because Nintendo won't get third party games due to not allowing/implementing such DRM on their console.

The DRM was pushed for by third parties. Sony and Microsoft gave in, because they need third parties. The only difference is that Microsoft gets completely in on the action while Sony is more like a bystander that watches you getting screwed over.


Im really getting sick of reading this. is there proof that third parties pushed this shit on MS on Sony?

Edit: to add, everyone hated nintendo even before this drm shit

Lol you should leave the discussion if your sick of reading that theres more to come, you can't deal?

are u even trying to hide ur flamebait lol....i can deal but thanks for your concern..it would just be nice if someone provided a source with proof that third parties were pushing for this type of DRM...

Flamebait? No no no im not that guy buddy you guys just get crazy this time of the year. If Microsoft and Sony are saying they will let the publishers choose how the drm works for their games it should go without saying that some of the bigger publishers may have had something to do with it being implemented. 

i just cant see MS and sony bending over backwards like this for a few publishers and there is no proof that publishers were pushing for it....