By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
orniletter on 03 June 2013
Edit Thread
S.T.A.G.E. said:
curl-6 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Sure...if you believe Retro has set more standards for themselves than Naughty Dog I leave you to that. Somwhere, someone will believe that as well.

Please have the maturity of respect opinions that differ from your own.


Thats pretty much the same way of saying I respect your opinion. Theres no equality to me between a company that makes new hits and a company that is a sequel factory. Sorry. I will enjoy them as the next guy but I have standards but in my book the team that takes the most risk and succeeds time and time again is the more valuable company. We agree to disagree plain and simple.


The risks are...a third-person-cover shooter with cinematic set pieces HIGHLY reminiscent of Tomb Raider...and another third person shooter with a survival horror twist and ZOMBIES...

in contrast to

reimagening an old classic in 3D and adapting and overhauling it to/for the new perspective....yeah, I see no double standards here, Retro clearly are a sequel factory