By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Heavenly_King said:
walsufnir said:

Really? This is what you are able to put out when you think of Halo 5? This is one of the bad posts... Why would it be stupid? Ah yes, because MS does stupid things by now and $ony doesn't? Well, that's a good argument.

And I think after Sony's render-target-disaster everybody in the industry knows that cgi-teasers aren't the best way to show games. Btw, do you remember when MS showed a Halo as cgi which had nothing to do with the game?

It is stupid, because it is too soon.   It is a flagship franchise that actually requires 2-3 years in order to be done properly; and even more considering they are going nextgen.   And also, it is too obvious for M$ to do this; considering how this gen went regarding M$ (sequels, sequels, sequels and more sequels)    people, gamers, media want new experiences at this E3.   If they do it it will be received very baldy.

Halo is going to have (and has had) yearly releases. 343 has two teams so each team gets about two years of development time per game. As long as they keep the quality up (which they have) then it's perfectly fine to do yearly releases. Properly done yearly releases (like COD) mean more sales, better brand recognition, more money, and happier fans.