| ListerOfSmeg said: When Sony was pushing PS3 as a Blu ray, it was the greatest idea ever. Now that MS is doing it, its suddenly wrong. However these are the same people that got convinced by Sony that a stand alone Blu ray player was 1000.00 but adding RAM, Graphics card, controller support, HDD could be done for 899.99 and Sony would only take a 200 loss. |
I did not see anyone saying it was wrong to put blu-ray in xbox 1, i've seen people saying that MS is late to the game with blu-ray.
But yeah everything can be interpreted in different ways. I've seen xbox fans saying blu-ray is the greatest thing ever for xbox 1 and when the ps3 did it they were saying blu-ray won't last like UMD discs.
But yeah the 200 bucks loss thing is silly, I think it was more around 300 bucks lost per console.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061116/085020.shtml (no idea if the article is reliable or not just using it as an example of estimated loss per console).
OT:
I look forward to E3 and what all three companies will be bringing to the table.
PSN ID: clemens-nl
