Do you want The rebels in Syria to Win

[Ckmlb1]

the2real4mafol said:

Sharu said:
Gaddafy (??) was killed. But deaths in Lybia aren't stopped.

Yeah it's really unstable in Libya there is still a weak government but do you really blame people for wanting to overthrow a ruler who was a tyranny for over 40 years? The people there though they had enough of dictatorship and being treated like shit by there government. But i guess the problem is, was this influenced from the outside or was it the people's revolution. Also, the problem with the killings is probably because everyone was allowed to keep what they found when they took over the military bases from Gaddafi's army. It will probably take years to recover there and prosper in a Gaddafi-free age

You argued earlier that the west should not support imposing islamic dictators like in Iran (Shah was the furthest possible thing from a islamic ruler), Afghanistan (the Taliban did not exist when the Soviets left, they came along in the mid-90s and won took over through a civil war) and Iraq (west didn't install anything, the people elected the government, the majority of the Iraqis are Shia so the Shia will logically lead the country now just as the Sunnis should lead Syria), but you seem fine with the overthrow of Qaddafi (almost impossible it seemed without western aid, at least at the speed it moved). By the same logic the Syrians are revolting against their dictatorial rulers. The jihadists joined the fight in Lybia as well and will flock to any war zone in a muslim country to spread their ideology and beliefs.