By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zizzla_Rachet said:
Kasz216 said:
mai said:
Kasz216 said:

Even if things go wrong and it ends up worse then an Assad government. It might end up better long term because it got to that stage sooner. Since i don't think there is any way for Assad to win unless he convinces the west to let Russia or Iran help them more openly.

So you haven't followed my advice, have you?

For the life of me I'm not sure what your referring too.  As far as i can tell though there are two options.

The status quo of what's happening now mantaining.

The rebels winning.... and likely putting in place a shitter government.

 

The Status quo leads to contant death, and fighting forever pretty much until the status quo loses it's power.

The Rebels winning, likely leads to a shitter government and more infighting... but eventually may turn into something decent.


Is the west just scared of states armed by Russia?

If someone is a ally of Russia, they are usually friendly with China too. A country no one would want to mess with. It's why no one from the west has intervened in Syria through direct force and only given aid and some arms 



Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030