we have to face the facts. the playstation corner will find every article to knock it. while ignoring the whole bottom of the eurogamer article talking about possible solutions. no one knows what microsoft has done to support the one with it. if we all agree microsoft's biggest asset this gen was live and online multiplayer then we can agree that this can(not will) be good for them. think mmo's. helloooooo...... is this thing on. all you hear is the flack about single player offline games.
i see gamers like pharaoh with a harden heart. this is what i see from ms....
-kinect 2.0
-illumiroom
-cloud computing in game
all of them have huge potential. without new tech we get stagnant. while hell yeah i'm getting a ps4, i'm beyond just more pretty power. we will see what they did with the ps4 eye. i don't care about a mood light or controller recognition that's the simplest thing they could do. that sculpting thing with move now that impress me. what else you got? .
kinect may have been a flop but i still blame it on cost cuttting. it went from it's own chip to none, low-res camera, less joints than the initial natal. crappy game implementation. the proof of that is in the guys using kinect with skyrim, bulletstorm, streetfighter, etc... (those guys disappeared oddly enough). they did better than anything ms or major devs to show the possibilities.
ask yourself stuff like if sony came out and said were going to be doing some cloud computing what would you think about it then? i can guarantee you would think its great and would revolutionize game. this i know. i've seen it over and over again. it's that it's only good if my preference does it syndrome. or as i like to call it just stupid
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
