Imaginedvl said:
VGKing said:
Imaginedvl said:
Yah, another great reply from VGKing :) Now telling me what I should care about and consider right or wrong?
The use of "senstionnal" keywords like "ant-consumers" does not make it more real...
You see, these statements are arrogant or anti-consumers to you just because you already made your oppinion about them years ago, great for you, but your oppinion is different than mine. Same goes for what is right or wrong or what is anti-consumers or not.
Just accept the fact that everyone does not think like you. Oh you can pretend to be the majority if it makes you happy; but I doubt it (at least oustide of the Sony fan base) :)
|
Limiting used games trading/selling/lending/whatever = Anti-Consumer. There is no debate here. This goes against what the majority of consumes want.
This statement that gamers will buy your console no matter what, its arrogant. It's not my opinion, its not my bias. This is the very definition of an arrogant statement.
I didn't make up my opinion about Microsoft years ago. My opinion keeps changing over time just like it does for Sony/Nintendo/Apple/whatever. It isn't just black/white, right/wrong.
|
No, this is just your opinion (and of course others are and are not sharing it).
And please about your opinion on MS... You are very well known for constantly bashing any MS threads on these forums :)
|
Stay on topic.
It's not my opinion, how is limitng used games not anti-consumer? Please explain.
