By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mmmfishtacos said:
hasonap said:

Exactly what I said a page ago but nobody seemed to listen :P

Btw a 200mbit/s steady line in Sweden costs me 30$ ! At the start of this gen I paid 40$ for 5mbit/s. Sure this may be sweden but just look at the numbers and apply them on other countries and you've got yourself a good investment in some years

 

Whether Xbox One games perform will better than PS4 titles (or vice-versa), however, is "too early to say," Blomberg adds.

"I think [Xbox One and PS4] will be very similar in the end," Blomberg says. "Of course, if we find areas where either platform is particularly strong then we'll take advantage of that. But it's too early to say if our games will look better on any of the two platforms. All I can say is that there's potential for visually stunning games on both platforms."

even he states it right here. They don't even know for sure that it will be better. 

I agree with him on that because we still haven't seen any game take advantage of the full power of either console. 

But what the main thing in this article is trying to acomplish is simply that there is a big potential for some things in games to take advantage of the cloud - its not for pixels, not for polygons and certainly not physics but things that are fixed like the lightning or the additional AI in the background in open world games.

This is where the cloud could shine and I am highlighting could because I myself am not sure how that's going to happen(current internet situation) but I am not dismissing it before seeing it like all lot of other guys are doing on this thread so you can remain sceptical or whatever but please don't just dismiss something before even seeing an example of it in real-time.