dsgrue3 on 28 May 2013
| sales2099 said: Thinking fan criteria = corporate criteria seems to be your forte. MS can look at profits and market share gains in their own regard, never mind Nin/Sony, to be able to make their confident claims. MS cares about profits more then marketshare....considering NA hasn't seen a price cut since 2008. PS3 has had $150 drop in the last 4 years by comparison. Again....corporate criteria > ours. |
Sure, but you're the one who brought it up?
Nintendo made more profit than MS and gobbled up more market share in the process.
Thus, evaluating the 3 competitors on that basis Microsoft still fails to attain the top position.
Again, not remotely comparable to the dominant position Sony was in with PS2 - most profit, astonomical market share, etc.
