orniletter said:
Train wreck said:
cannonballZ said:
I bought the game, but almost skipped out on it because of no online play. The game is pretty good, better than I thought it would be after reading pretty bad reviews.
But they have a lot of nerve saying it is THE definitive version in an interview, and then leave out online play. I'm getting tired of the half-assed approach that devs are taking with the Wii U. |
I guess at some point people will hold Nintendo accountable for:
1. Allowing games to be published that are severely inferior to their competetiors console counterparts, it seems that Nintendo and their biggest supporters like to turn a blind eye on this. (Seal of approval for the win)
2. Not be stingy and lower royalities fees on ports so publishers wont be so quick to charge full price for late port games (profit margin has to be realized somewhere).
|
So it is now Nintendo´s fault ? You have to be kidding me !
|
So if both Microsoft and Sony were home builders and you had a 3rd party make a faucet, the faucet itself is pretty shitty and not of high quality but it works and they both allow it to be furnished in the home.
The same 3rd party comes to the homebuilder Nintendo with the same product but during the install process its obviously clear its not at the same standards of the other two, even though the quality itself was already bad...but Nintendo lets it be furnish in the home anyway...
At what point do you stop blaming the 3rd party for delivering sub par games (which they tend to do alot) and blame Nintendo for letting said games (with even below quality than its competetiors for the same game) on their systems.
