By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
Mmmfishtacos said:
Yes, because of the back ground of the drive club people have all made fun good looking games. 

To answer the other guy. I've had more fun in PGR, wipe and GT than I ever did with Forza. The only thing I ever liked from Forza was the Paint editor. The game play and driving was boring and painful, IMO. I'll say it again, critically acclaimed means squat. Period. MS has been buying reviews left and right this gen. and Forza to me is 75-80. So to me and many it's on the bottom of the list.

 

http://www.metacritic.com/company/evolution-studios

Odd since Forza actually takes more steps to make the simulation fun with fun gameplay modes. Ive heard that said about GT5, which is pure no-frills driving.

Also a fail observation with 0 back-up that MS buys reviews.....since they would have to buy dozens upon dozens to make a difference since metacritic scores take dozens of reviews to make a average. To say that but not imply Sony does the same shows heavy bias.

Seeing the link, Turn 10 has ZERO trouble from a critical standpoint. Evolution makes graphically stunning games, but is a 70-79 developer as of late.

 

Remember this? And all of this:

http://kotaku.com/5957810/the-contemptible-games-journalist-why-so-many-people-dont-trust-the-gaming-press-and-why-theyre-sometimes-wrong

Of course they buy reviews, it seems like most of them do. I'm sure that includes Sony, it's just they haven't been caught yet (as far as I know)



PSN: Osc89

NNID: Oscar89