Mr Khan said:
The native american thing was an actual case. I remember (granted this was AP Government back in senior year of high school) that whatever that was was a landmark case on freedom of religion. Plus this court has a positive association with "government forcing people to do stuff." Between their ruling on the broader ACA and their history on the clash between religion and law, the evidence leans in one direction. Though this court has been known to contradict itself (apparently first sale doctrine applies to college textbooks but not to seeds generated by living plants...) |
Oh, I know it was an actual case. I just meant specifically what I said. Often times unfortunitly, the court rules not just based on the merits of the case, but the size of the population in which the case effects.
