xwan on 23 May 2013
we'll see i remain skeptical about it, taking pictures 100 times per second may not be necessary, because if u think about it, human "normal" heart rate is about 60-100 times per minute. So if you have HR of 60 beats per minute, u just have to measure difference within that 1 second. So one picture each 500ms will do the job. But as you become more tachycardic, then of course measurement needs to be more frequent.
I do not see this working on ALL people, what about patients whom are on beta blockers that slows HR down artificially. And what about patient that I have pacemaker with set rate? u know, I will see once i get my hands on it. But anyways, I don't see it as a "game changer" anyways, myself.
