BenVTrigger said:
KingKazuma34 said:
BenVTrigger said:
KingKazuma34 said:
So, Sony is not allowed to show sequels to some of their biggest games but MS is? Makes sense........ |
I don't think you read the thread at all.....
and it's responses like this that aren't aiding in the actually pretty deep discussion were having. Personally I was stoked to see Killzone and Infamous. And I criticized MS for not showing more titles.
read the thread
|
I did read the thread thanks though. You said Sony showed games that were pretty much the same as their last games, like Killzone, Infamous SS. The same could be said for MS. They showed Cod which is multiplatform, EA games which are ALL multiplatform, Forza 5 which is more of the same, Halo which is more of the same, sure an improved kinect but the xbox one will not work without it connected to it. Sorry for ruining your "deep discussion" on an internet fourm.
|
There's nothing wrong with "more of the same" in fact in my grading I praised them for showing those two franchises as they are established core IPs.
my criticism is that the titles won't move the mainstream consumer. Compare a infamous and Killzone sales to Fifa and COD. MS is trying to put mainstream large selling franchises in the mindshare of the consumer to associate them with Xbox One a sound strategy. I just think Sony should have had a few larger scale title to grab some headlines.
MS as well should have shown probably 2 new or established core IPs as well to balance their conference, so both had faults.
|
I can agree with you there. Both conferences had some faults. I get what your saying, Fifa and Cod are more known to the market than infamous or Killzone, I didn't think about it like that, so your right on that. We will just have to wait until E3 to see what they both have, it should be really good on both sides.
